Capital Design
Execution Engine
Not a chatbot. Not a search engine. AscertAInit is a structured review engine: every finding is traceable to a specific design consideration, every output is audit-ready.
Structured Design Review
Upload engineering documents. Get severity-graded findings mapped to specific code clauses across 7,500+ expert authored criteria items.
Cross-Discipline Consistency
Eliminate interface clashes before they hit the field. 73+ modules across 12 disciplines and growing ensure your Process, Mechanical, and I&C teams are actually building the same plant.
Robust Integration Excellence
Cross-references documents and inputs like never before, ensuring consistency among tables, lists, drawings, deliverables, and calculations in one single check.
Package Intelligence
Project dashboards, batch upload with AI-powered document classification, cross-reference resolution, and aggregated maturity scoring across all modules.
Document Intelligence
Native ingestion across engineering file formats. Each document type requires its own parsing strategy, structural detection, and content normalization layer before a single review can begin.
Domain-Specific Routing
Every document is matched to a purpose-built review module spanning three engines. Each module encodes discipline-specific evaluation criteria designed by engineers, for engineers.
Project & Design Considerations Engine
Distilled evaluation logic informed by government and commercial national consensus codes and standards, with DOE and NRC regulatory frameworks selectable per project context. Structured for computational efficiency and focused on what matters most to capital project reviewers.
Cross-Document Reconciliation
No document exists in isolation. The platform verifies every submission against the full body of project documents already in session. Discrepancies between drawings, specifications, and estimates are surfaced automatically, not left for a reviewer to catch by memory.
Quantitative Analysis
Statistical methods applied to cost estimates, schedule metrics, and engineering data to surface anomalies that narrative review alone cannot detect. Multiple analysis techniques operate in parallel across every submission.
Adversarial Detection
Capital project deliverables don't always reflect ground truth. Schedules are compressed without resequencing logic. Contingencies are buried or stripped. This layer is designed to find it. Detection patterns built from observed risk behaviors flag indicators of schedule risk, optimism bias, and concealed assumptions before they reach a decision-maker.
Structured, Auditable Output
Every finding carries a severity grade, evidence citation, impact assessment, and recommended action. Output is structured for direct use in board-level reporting, regulatory submissions, and investment due diligence. No interpretation required.
73+ Modules. 12
Disciplines and growing.
One Platform.
Each module is purpose-built for a specific engineering discipline, evaluated against expert authored criteria and domain-specific codes, standards, and regulatory frameworks. Every criteria item is verified through automated quality gates: standard-reference validation, cross-domain consistency checks, and severity calibration.
Process Engineering
Design completeness and safety basis verification across process documents
Piping
Pipe class, material, and routing compliance across design deliverables
Mechanical
Equipment specification completeness and design basis conformance
Civil & Structural
Structural adequacy and site design compliance across disciplines
Electrical
Power system design review across protection, distribution, and safety systems
Instrumentation & Controls
Control system completeness, loop integrity, and alarm rationalization review
Safety & Fire Protection
Safety system design adequacy and hazard documentation completeness
HVAC & Ventilation
Ventilation design basis compliance and confinement system review
Project Controls & Quality
Scope definition, work packaging, and configuration control readiness
Specialty & Multidiscipline
Cross-discipline coordination and specialty system design verification
Nuclear Standards
Regulatory framework compliance and DOE/NRC design requirements review
Environmental & Safety
Permit readiness, regulatory compliance, and hazard documentation review
See It In Action
Piping and Instrumentation Diagram (P&ID)
Upload Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams for AI analysis of design intent, safety, and operational continuity against lists, indexes, narratives, etc.
Cause & Effect Matrix
Upload a C&E matrix (PDF or image) and let AI evaluate logic completeness, I/O allocation, and SIL compliance.
Single Line Diagrams (SLD)
Upload Electrical Single Line Diagrams for AI structural analysis, breaker coordination, and load validation.
General Arrangement / Equipment Layouts
Toggle submodule categories on or off to focus the review on your relevant disciplines (structural, MEP, fire safety, maintenance envelopes, etc.).
Phase Gate Review
Upload Project Execution Plans, Master Document Registers, and Risk Registers to verify DOE O 413.3B gate readiness.
Five Steps. Full Traceability.
Engineered for rigorous nuclear, DOE, and NNSA environments, AscertAIn applies across industrial capital facilities where precision, consistency, and an audit trail are paramount.
Upload Diagrams, Specs, Calculations, Drawings, etc.
Upload All Pertinent Input Documents
AI Reviews criteria
Severity-Graded Findings
Reports, Dispositions, and More
Configuration Control
Every AI recommendation is tied to a specific version of the design baseline.
Traceability
Every finding maps to specific design considerations and constraints. No generic suggestions : only auditable, defensible results.
Human-in-the-Loop
AI proposes, but qualified engineers always dispose. No automated commits.
From Pilot to Portfolio
Start with one discipline. Prove ROI in 6 weeks. Expand on your terms. Designed for environments where incremental validation isn't optional: it's how you build institutional trust in new tools.
Start with a targeted pilotTargeted Pilot
Deploy AscertAInit on targeted deliverable review workflows : such as P&IDs, electrical SLDs, instrument I/O indexes, or other common engineering deliverables: and demonstrate measurable ROI in minutes.
Program Integration
Expand across disciplines and document types. Integrate with existing EDMS workflows. Enable cross-discipline maturity scoring and aggregated findings reports.
Portfolio Optimization
Enterprise-wide design verification across all programs. Compliance dashboards, regulatory trending, and continuous design maturity tracking from FEED through commissioning.
Start with one discipline. Prove ROI in 6 weeks.
View Engagement ModelsSee What Your Reviews Are Missing.
Bring your document type. We'll run a live review and show you what AscertAInit finds. Built by engineers who have worked inside DOE programs, national labs, and EPC firms delivering complex industrial infrastructure.
Technical Consultation
Speak with an engineer about your specific use case.
Pilot Program
Learn about our 6-week proof-of-value framework.
Schedule a Technical Demo
30 minutes with our engineering team. Bring your document type: we'll run a live review.
Book a Technical Demo →